On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 15:15, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > AFAICS that could only happen if "double" has 8-byte alignment > requirement but int64 does not. I recall some discussion about > that possibility a month or two back, but I think we concluded > that we weren't going to support it.
ok > I guess what I mostly don't like about df0f4feef is the hardwired "8" > constants. Yeah, it's hard to see how sizeof(uint64) isn't 8, but > it's not very readable like this IMO. Yeah, that was just down to lack of any SIZEOF_* macro to tell me uint64 was 8 bytes. I can revert df0f4feef, but would prefer just to get the green light for d5ee4db0e from those 32-bit arm animals before doing so. David
