Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > It's only half related, but since we're talking about renovating guc.c: I > think it'd be good if we split the list of GUCs from the rest of the guc > machinery. Both for humans and compilers it's getting pretty large. And > commonly one either wants to edit the definition of GUCs or wants to edit the > GUC machinery.
I don't mind doing that, but it seems like an independent patch. regards, tom lane