On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:25:15 +0200 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2022-Sep-08, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > I believe this very small bug and its fix are really trivial and could be > > push out of the way quite quickly. It's just about a bad constraint name > > fixed by moving one assignation after the next one. This could easily be > > fixed for next round of releases. > > > > Well, I hope I'm not wrong :) > > I think you're right, so pushed, and backpatched to 12. I added the > test case to regression also. Great, thank you for the additional work on the regression test and the commit! > For 11, I adjusted the test case so that it didn't depend on an FK > pointing to a partitioned table (which is not supported there); it turns > out that the old code is not smart enough to get into the problem in the > first place. [...] > It seems fair to say that this case, with pg11, is unsupported and > people should upgrade if they want better behavior. That works for me. Thanks!
