On 12.09.22 15:49, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
On 09.09.22 22:13, Tom Lane wrote:
I think serious consideration should be given to back-patching the
0001 part (that is, addition of the macros). Otherwise we'll have
to remember not to use these macros in code intended for back-patch,
and that'll be mighty annoying once we are used to them.
Yes, the 0001 patch is kept separate so that we can do that when we feel
the time is right.
I think the right time is now, or at least as soon as you're
satisfied that the buildfarm is happy.
This has been done.
