On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:11 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote: > > At Thu, 15 Sep 2022 22:38:01 +0800, Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com> wrote in > > > > Hi hacker, > > > > Recently, I find there might be a typo in xact.c comments. The comments > > say "PG_PROC", however, it actually means "PGPROC" structure. Since we > > have pg_proc catalog, and use PG_PROC to reference the catalog [1], so, > > we should use PGPROC to reference the structure. Any thoughts? > > > > [1] src/include/nodes/primnodes.h > > The patch seems to me covering all occurances of PG_PROC as PGPROC.
+1 since this hinders grep-ability. > I found several uses of PG_PROC as (pg_catalog.)pg_proc, which is > quite confusing, too.. It's pretty obvious to me what that refers to in primnodes.h, although the capitalization of (some, but not all) catalog names in comments in that file is a bit strange. Maybe not worth changing there. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
