Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> writes:
> At Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:30:37 -0400, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in
>> I think you should leave the primary message alone and add a DETAIL,
>> as the first version of the patch did.
> So I'm going to change the mssage as:
> LOG: terminating process %d to release replication slot \"%s\"
> DETAIL: The slot's restart_lsn %X/%X exceeds the limit by %lld bytes.
> HINT: You might need to increase max_slot_wal_keep_size.
> LOG: invalidating *replication* slot \"%s\"
> DETAILS: (ditto)
> HINTS: (ditto)
I thought the latter was a little *too* short; the primary message
should at least give you some clue why that happened, even if it
doesn't offer all the detail. After some thought I changed it to
LOG: invalidating obsolete replication slot \"%s\"
and pushed it that way.
regards, tom lane
