On 2018/04/24 4:33, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: >> On 2018/04/22 2:29, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I propose the attached slightly-less-invasive version of Amit's original >>> patch as what we should do in v10 and v11, and push the patch currently >>> under discussion out to v12. > >> Here too. > > Pushed. It occurred to me at the last moment that we could partially > address one of my original concerns about this hack by converting TRUE > and FALSE to strings 'true' and 'false' not just 't' and 'f'. Those > will be accepted by boolin just as well, and doing it like that slightly > reduces the astonishment factor if somebody writes TRUE for, say, a > text column's partbound. I'd still prefer that we throw an error for > such a case, but that'll have to wait for v12.
Thanks for making that change and committing. Regards, Amit
