On 10/1/22 3:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

I'm still of the opinion that we need to revert this code for now.

[RMT hat, but speaking just for me] reading through Tom's analysis, this seems to be the safest path forward. I have a few questions to better understand:

1. How invasive would the revert be?
2. Are the other user-visible items that would be impacted?
3. Is there an option of disabling the feature by default viable?

Thanks,

Jonathan

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to