Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]> writes: > I think Tom's point was that it's wrong to add a separate entry-tree CPU > cost estimation to another estimation, which tries (very inadequately) to > estimate the whole scan cost. Instead, I propose writing better estimations > for both entry-tree CPU cost and data-trees CPU cost and replacing existing > CPU estimation altogether.
Great idea, if someone is willing to do it ...
regards, tom lane
