On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 4:23 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:32 PM Simon Riggs > <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 10:33, Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, I will make all of those corrections in the > > > next version. > > > > New version attached. I've rolled 002-004 into one patch, but can > > split again as needed. > > I like the idea of "parse only" and "nested xact", thanks for working > on this. I will look into patches in more detail, especially nested > xact. IMHO there is no point in merging "nested xact" and "rollback on > commit". They might be changing the same code location but these two > are completely different ideas, in fact all these three should be > reviewed as three separate threads as you mentioned in the first email > in the thread.
What is the behavior if "nested_transactions" value is changed within a transaction execution, suppose the value was on and we have created a few levels of nested subtransactions and within the same transaction I switched it to off or to outer? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
