On 10/5/22 06:23, Jelte Fennema wrote: > In my first version of this patch, this is exactly what I did. But then > I got this feedback from Jacob, so I changed it to reusing PGconn: > >> [snip] > > I changed it back to use PGcancelConn as per your suggestion and I > agree that the API got better because of it.
Sorry for the whiplash! Is the latest attachment the correct version? I don't see any difference between the latest 0001 and the previous version's 0002 -- it has no references to PG_TEST_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT, PGcancelConn, etc. Thanks, --Jacob
