On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:58 AM Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> + <entry>if you are reading this prepatorily, please redesign your >> query to use temporary tables or arrays</entry> >> > > I agree with the documentation of this parameter. > I agree with dissuading anyone from attempting to change it > The wording is bordering on snark (however well deserved) and I think the > voice is slightly off. > > Alternate suggestion: > > Queries approaching this limit usually can be refactored to use arrays or > temporary tables, thus reducing parameter overhead. > > > The bit about parameter overhead appeals to the reader's desire for > performance, rather than just focusing on "you shouldn't want this". > Yeah, the wording is a bit tongue-in-cheek. Figured assuming a committer wants this at all we'd come up with better wording. I like your suggestion. David J.
