"Anton A. Melnikov" <aamelni...@inbox.ru> writes:
> On 02.11.2022 21:02, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't think the cost of that test case is justified by the tiny
>> probability that it'd ever catch anything.
> Seems it is possible to do a test without these remarks. The attached
> test uses existing nodes and checks the specific error message.
My opinion remains unchanged: this would be a very poor use of test
cycles.
> Additionally
> i've tried to reduce overall number of nodes previously
> used in this test in a similar way.
Optimizing existing tests isn't an answer to that. We could
install those optimizations without adding a new test case.
regards, tom lane
