On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:33 AM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please review the v2 patch.
It seems to me that this will call disable_startup_progress_timeout once per WAL record, which seems like an unnecessary expense. How about leaving the code inside the loop just as we have it, and putting if (StandbyMode) disable_startup_progress_timeout() before entering the loop? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
