On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 12:32:19AM -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> @@ -32,6 +33,12 @@ typedef enum BackendState
> STATE_DISABLED
> } BackendState;
>
> +/* Enum helper for reporting memory allocated bytes */
> +enum allocation_direction
> +{
> + DECREASE = -1,
> + INCREASE = 1,
> +};
BTW, these should have some kind of prefix, like PG_ALLOC_* to avoid
causing the same kind of problem for someone else that another header
caused for you by defining something somewhere called IGNORE (ignore
what, I don't know). The other problem was probably due to a define,
though. Maybe instead of an enum, the function should take a boolean.
I still wonder whether there needs to be a separate CF entry for the
0001 patch. One issue is that there's two different lists of people
involved in the threads.
--
Justin
