On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:09 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've investigated this issue and have a question about using atomic > variables on palloc'ed memory. In non-parallel vacuum cases, > radix_tree_control is allocated via aset.c. IIUC in 32-bit machines, > the memory allocated by aset.c is 4-bytes aligned so these atomic > variables are not always 8-bytes aligned. Is there any way to enforce > 8-bytes aligned memory allocations in 32-bit machines?
The bigger question in my mind is: Why is there an atomic variable in backend-local memory? -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
