On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 03:20:44PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 4/27/18 11:03, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:00:36AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> On 4/23/18 05:54, Liudmila Mantrova wrote: > >>> Reading this thread, I got an impression that everyone would benefit > >>> from converting back branches to XML, but the main concern is lack of > >>> resources to complete this task. Are there any other issues that affect > >>> this decision? Looks like Aleksander Lakhin's offer to prepare patches > >>> was missed somehow as the discussion sidetracked to other issues > >> > >> That proposal seemed to indicate not only converting the source code to > >> XML but also the build system to XSL. The latter is out of the > >> question, I think. > > > > Why is that? > Because there would be a thousand lines of tooling changes to be > backported and thousands of pages of documentation to be checked > manually that it doesn't create a mess (times branches times platforms).
Oh, OK. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
