On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 1:42 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > One small problem is that top_parent doesn't exist in the back branches, > so I had to substitute a much uglier lookup in order to make this work > there. I'm surprised that we got away without top_parent for this long > TBH, but anyway this fix validates the wisdom of 2f17b5701. > > So, pushed with some cosmetic adjustments and the modified back-branch > code.
Thanks for the modifying and pushing and the back-patching. I didn't realize how the fix should look like if without top_parent. Thanks to the work in 2f17b5701, it makes life much easier. Thanks Richard
