On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 08:47:32AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote: > From a typical use case point of view, I'd say uniform, normal and > exponential would make sense for floats. I'm also okay with generating a > uniform bytes pseudo-randomly.
I'd agree with this set. > I'd be more at ease to add simple functions rather than a special > heavy-on-keywords syntax, even if standard. Okay. >> Note that SQLValueFunction made the addition of more returning data >> types a bit more complicated (not much, still) than the new >> COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX by going through a mapping function, so the >> keyword/function mapping is straight-forward. > > I'm unclear about why this paragraph is here. Just saying that using COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX for SQL keywords is easier than the older style. If the SQL specification mentions no SQL keywords for such things, this is irrelevant, of course :) -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
