On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 4:57 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:19:24PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > In the first place "file sequence number" and "segno" can hardly be > > associated by appearance by readers, I think. (Yeah, we can identify > > that since the another parameter is identifiable alone.) Why don't we > > spell out the parameter simply as "segment number"? > > As in using "sequence number" removing "file" from the docs and > changing the OUT parameter name to segment_number rather than segno? > Fine by me.
+1. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
