Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> Somewhat of a tangent: I've previously wondered if we should have a small
> hash-table based clog cache. The current one-element cache doesn't suffice in
> a lot of scenarios, but it wouldn't take a huge cache to end up filtering most
> clog accesses.
I've wondered about that too. The one-element cache was a good hack
in its day, but it looks a bit under-engineered by our current
standards. (Also, maybe it'd be plausible to have a one-element
cache in front of a small hash?)
regards, tom lane
