On 02.05.2018 17:44, Robert Haas wrote:
But having parallel make work better and more efficiently and with fewer hard-to-diagnose failure modes would definitely be nice.
that's especially a thing I haven't seen in "our" environment, this was an area where autotools and cmake didn't really differ, at least not for the Unix/Makefile side of things. The only thing about parallelism I remember that it sometimes doesn't work well with the progress percentage output of cmake generated makefiles ... but that's purely cosmetic. -- hartmut
