On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 09:41:47AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > I am not sure if I understand the problem you are trying to solve with > this part of the patch. Are you worried that after we mark some of the > relation's state as READY, all the table syncs are in the READY state > but we will not immediately try to check the two_pahse stuff and > probably the apply worker may sleep before the next time it invokes > process_syncing_tables_for_apply()?
Yes. > If so, we probably also need to > ensure that table_states_valid is marked false probably via > invalidations so that we can get the latest state and then perform > this check. I guess if we can do that then we can directly move the > restart logic to the end. IMO this shows the advantage of just waking up the worker. It doesn't change the apply worker's behavior besides making it more responsive. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com