Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 5/3/18 15:37, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I took a quick look into this. It's very easy to do so far as the Perl
>> code is concerned:
> I think in order to introduce warts like that, we have to have really
> great savings. I haven't seen any actual analysis what the current
> problem is, other than one person expression a suspicion.
Well, the work's already done, and personally I think the code is
cleaner after 9bf28f96c and bad51a49a regardless of whether there's any
performance benefit. You could call 1f1cd9b5d a wart if you wanted.
But we've done largely the same thing to pgindent, for one, in the past
year or so, and I find that to be a usability improvement, independently
of whether there's any build performance win. My editor gets cranky
when files change under it for no reason.
regards, tom lane
