On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:45:13AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I went with the patch I had posted, since I needed to move ahead with > something. If it turns out to be a problem, we can easily switch it > around.
Okay. > As Tom mentioned, in order to grow the SPI stack to where it has a > significant size, you might also overrun the OS stack and other things. > On the other hand, the current/new arrangement is a win for normal SPI > use, since you don't need to rebuild the stack on every call. It would be nice to mention that in the release notes.. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
