On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 3:44 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Friday, January 13, 2023 1:43 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 9:34 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com > > <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
In GetLogicalLeaderApplyWorker(), we can use shared lock instead exclusive as we are just reading the workers array. Also, the function name looks a bit odd to me, so I changed it to GetLeaderApplyWorkerPid(). Also, it is better to use InvalidPid instead of 0 when there is no valid value for leader_pid in GetLeaderApplyWorkerPid(). Apart from that, I have made minor changes in the comments, docs, and commit message. I am planning to push this next week by Tuesday unless you or others have any major comments. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
v81-0001-Display-the-leader-apply-worker-s-PID-for-parall.patch
Description: Binary data
