Hi! I've found the discussion you'd mentioned before, checking now.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 4:49 AM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:12:18PM +0300, Nikita Malakhov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently there is no error in this case, so additional thrown error > would > > require a new test. > > Besides, throwing an error here does not make sense - it is just a check > > for a vacuum > > permission, I think the right way is to just skip a relation that is not > > suitable for vacuum. > > Any thoughts or objections? > > Could you check if this is consistent between the behavior of VACUUM > FULL and CLUSTER ? See also Nathan's patches. > > -- > Justin > -- Regards, Nikita Malakhov Postgres Professional https://postgrespro.ru/
