Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2023-01-28 11:38:50 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> FWIW, my vote goes for a more expensive but reliable function even in >> stable branches.
> I very strenuously object. If we make txid_current() (by way of
> pg_current_xact_id()) flush WAL, we'll cause outages.
What are you using it for, that you don't care whether the answer
is trustworthy?
regards, tom lane
