Hi Peter,

> > What is the status of this patch set?  Michael had registered himself as
> > committer and then removed himself again.  So I hadn't been paying much
> > attention myself.  Was there anything left to discuss?
>
> Previously I marked the patch as RfC. Although it's been a few months
> ago and I don't recall all the details, it should have been in good
> shape (in my personal opinion at least). The commits a9e9a9f and
> 0873b2d Michael referred to are message refactorings so I doubt Jacob
> had serious problems with them.
>
> Of course, I'll take another fresh look and let you know my findings in a bit.

The code is well written, documented and test-covered. All the tests
pass. To my knowledge there are no open questions left. I think the
patch is as good as it will ever get.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev


Reply via email to