Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > Could it be worth back-patching f3e7806?
That's aged long enough now that it seems like a pretty safe thing to do. regards, tom lane
Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > Could it be worth back-patching f3e7806?
That's aged long enough now that it seems like a pretty safe thing to do. regards, tom lane