On 2018/05/09 22:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2018/05/09 11:31, David Rowley wrote: >>> On 9 May 2018 at 14:29, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>>> On 2018/05/09 11:20, Michael Paquier wrote: >>>>> While looking at this code, is there any reason to not make >>>>> gen_partprune_steps static? This is only used in partprune.c for now, >>>>> so the intention is to make it available for future patches? > >> Here is a patch that does that. > > Pushed, thanks.
Thank you. Regards, Amit
