On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 11:17 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 3:43 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com > <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > while reading the code, I noticed that in pa_send_data() we set wait > > event to WAIT_EVENT_LOGICAL_PARALLEL_APPLY_STATE_CHANGE while > sending > > the message to the queue. Because this state is used in multiple > > places, user might not be able to distinguish what they are waiting > > for. So It seems we'd better to use WAIT_EVENT_MQ_SEND here which will > > be eaier to distinguish and understand. Here is a tiny patch for that. > >
As discussed[1], we'd better invent a new state for this purpose, so here is the patch that does the same. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LTud4FLRbS0QqdZ-pjSxwfFLHC1Dx%3D6Q7nyROCvvPSfw%40mail.gmail.com Best Regards, Hou zj
0001-Add-new-wait-event-to-be-used-in-apply-worker.patch
Description: 0001-Add-new-wait-event-to-be-used-in-apply-worker.patch
