Hi, Please see the attached patch for following changes.
Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com>, 30 Oca 2023
Pzt, 15:34 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:19 PM Melih Mutlu <m.melihmu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
It'd be better and clearer to have a separate TAP test file IMO since
> the focus of the feature here isn't to just test for data types. With
> separate tests, you can verify "ERROR: incorrect binary data format
> in logical replication column 1" cases.
>
Moved some tests from 002_types.pl to 014_binary.pl since this is where
most binary features are tested. It covers now "incorrect data format"
cases too.
Also added some regression tests for copy_format parameter.
> With the above said, do you think checking for publisher versions is
> needed? The user can decide to enable/disable binary COPY based on the
> publisher's version no?
> + /* If the publisher is v16 or later, specify the format to copy data.
> */
> + if (walrcv_server_version(LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn) >= 160000)
> + {
>
If the user decides to enable it, then it might be nice to not allow it for
previous versions.
But I'm not sure. I'm okay to remove it if you all agree.
> Few more comments on v7:
> 1.
> + Specifies the format in which pre-existing data on the
> publisher will
> + copied to the subscriber. Supported formats are
> + <literal>text</literal> and <literal>binary</literal>. The
> default is
> + <literal>text</literal>.
> It'll be good to call out the cases in the documentation as to where
> copy_format can be enabled and needs to be disabled.
>
Modified that description a bit. Can you check if that's okay now?
> 2.
> + errmsg("%s value should be either \"text\" or \"binary\"",
> How about "value must be either ...."?
>
Done
> 3.
> Why should the subscription's binary option and copy_format option be
> tied at all? Tying these two options hurts usability. Is there a
> fundamental reason? I think they both are/must be independent. One
> deals with data types and another deals with how initial table data is
> copied.
>
My initial purpose with this patch was just making subscriptions with
binary option enabled fully binary from initial copy to apply. Things have
changed a bit when we decided to move binary copy behind a parameter.
I didn't actually think there would be any use case where a user wants the
initial copy to be in binary format for a sub with binary = false. Do you
think it would be useful to copy in binary even for a sub with binary
disabled?
Thanks,
--
Melih Mutlu
Microsoft
v8-0001-Allow-logical-replication-to-copy-table-in-binary.patch
Description: Binary data
