Hi, On 2023-02-20 14:21:39 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > I totally agree that it will be useful, but I'm not quite sure how > checkpointer would be able to let postmaster know about that state > without requiring access to shared memory.
SendPostmasterSignal(PMSIGNAL_SHUTDOWN_CHECKPOINT_COMPLETE); or such. Greetings, Andres Freund
