On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 1:09 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2023-03-02 12:29:28 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > > ... Huh... what am I missing? I > > thought the only risk was handlers running in the opposite of send > > order because they 'overlapped', not non-handler code being allowed to > > run in between. > > I see ProcessInterrupts() being called too - but it's independent of the > changes we discuss here. The reason for it is the CFI() at the end of > errfinish().
Ahh, right, I see.
