On 16.03.23 19:11, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2023-03-16 13:54:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
On 2023-03-16 12:10:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
It wouldn't be entirely surprising if meson is selecting some -W
switches that the configure script doesn't ... but I don't know
where to check or change that.

I think it's just that meson defaults to -O3 (fwiw, I see substantial gains of
that over -O2).  I see such warnings with autoconf as well if I make it use
-O3.

Oh, interesting.  Should we try to standardize the two build systems
on the same -O level, and if so which one?

I'm on the fence on this one (and posed it as a question before). O3 does
result in higher performance for me, but it also does take longer to build,
and increases the numbers of warnings.

So I just elected to leave it at the default for meson.

AFAICT, the default for meson is buildtype=debug, which is -O0. The -O3 comes from meson.build setting buildtype=release.

I think a good compromise would be buildtype=debugoptimized, which is -O2 with debug symbols, which also sort of matches the default in the autoconf world.

(https://mesonbuild.com/Builtin-options.html#details-for-buildtype)

At least during the transition phase I would prefer having the same default optimization level in both build systems, mainly because of how this affects warnings.



Reply via email to