On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 9:45 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are a bunch of moving parts and hidden subtleties here, and I fell > > into a few traps when I was working on my patch, so it'd be nice to have > > additional coverage. I'm happy to contribute effort in that area if it's > > helpful. > > I think it depends on what tests you have in mind.
Just the ones I mentioned, to start with. > I suggest you can > propose a patch to cover tests for this are in a separate thread. We > can then evaluate those separately. To confirm -- you want me to start a new thread for tests for this patchset? (Tests written against HEAD would likely be obsoleted by this change.) --Jacob
