Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2023-03-20 10:37:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I agree that attinhcount could be narrowed, but I have some concern
>> about attstattarget. IIRC, the limit on attstattarget was once 1000
>> and then we raised it to 10000. Is it inconceivable that we might
>> want to raise it to 100000 someday?
> Hard to believe that'd happen in a minor version - and I don't think there'd
> an issue with widening it again in a major version?
True. However, I think Tomas' idea of making these columns nullable
is even better than narrowing them.
regards, tom lane
