On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> writes: > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Perhaps there is a case for adding an additional flag to allow > specifying > >> "I can't support ORDER BY DESC", but I'm not in a big hurry to do so. > >> I think there would be more changes than this needed to handle such a > >> restriction, anyway. > > > OK, got it. We'll probably propose a patch implementing that to the > > next commitfest. > > If you do, it wouldn't be a bad idea to try to clarify the existing > code and docs around this point. I'm thinking that amcanbackward is > misleadingly named; maybe we should rename it as part of the change? > I was thinking about naming new property as amcanorderbydesc, which is kind of non-overlapping with amcanbackward. For sure, amcanbackward could be renamed, but I don't have ideas of better name for now. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
