On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 21:30, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 18:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> I would not expect DISCARD ALL to reset a session-level property. > > > Well if we can't reset it with DISCARD ALL how would that work with > > pgbouncer, or any pool for that matter since it doesn't know which client > > asked for which (if any) OID's to be binary. > > Well, it'd need to know that, just like it already needs to know > which clients asked for which database or which login role. >
OK, IIUC what you are proposing here is that there would be a separate pool for database, user, and OIDs. This doesn't seem too flexible. For instance if I create a UDT and then want it to be returned as binary then I have to reconfigure the pool to be able to accept a new list of OID's. Am I mis-understanding how this would potentially work? Dave > >
