On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 00:17 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > The other patch you posted seems like it makes a lot of progress in > that direction, and I think that should go in first. That was one of > the items I suggested previously[2], so thank you for working on > that.
The above is not a hard objection. I still hold the opinion that the non-superuser subscriptions work is feels premature without the apply-as-table-owner work. It would be great if the other patch ends up ready quickly, which would moot the commit-ordering question. Regards, Jeff Davis