On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 4:58 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > It's not about me, but without knowing the history, "debug" can > look as if it is less chatty than "debug2" or even "debug1". All > log level of "debugN" are seen as DEBUG in log lines. Thus > showing "debug2" as just "debug" may obfuscate the cause of > having so many log lines. > > From another view point, it can be thought as not-good that print > a value with a hidden word. > > In short, I submit +1 for this.
OK, I'm happy enough to commit it then, barring other objections. I was just going to just do that but then I realized we're in feature freeze right now, so I suppose this should go into the next CommitFest. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
