Onur Tirtir <onur.tir...@microsoft.com> writes: > Thank you for sharing your proposal as a patch. It looks much nicer and > useful than mine. > I've also tested it for a few cases --by injecting a memory error on > purpose-- and seen that it helps reporting the problematic query. > Should we move forward with v3 then?
OK, I pushed v3 as-is. We can refine it later if anyone has suggestions.
Thanks for the contribution!
regards, tom lane
