At Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:17:46 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote in > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 05:25:46PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > Wouldn't storing the value in the shared memory itself work? Though, > > that space does become almost dead for the server's lifetime... > > Sure, it would work. However, we'd still need an interface for the > extra function. At this point, a GUC with an unknown state is kind of > OK for me. Anyway, where would you stick this state?
(Digging memory..) Sorry for confusion but I didn't mean to stick to the function. Just I thought that some people seem to dislike having the third state for the should-be-boolean variable. So, I'm okay with GUC, having "unknown". regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
