Hi, On 2023-04-11 13:35:38 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2023-04-11 14:46:23 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Yes, $SUBJECT is correct. > > > > On an old centos6 VM which I'd forgotten about and never removed from > > monitoring, I noticed that a process had recently crashed... > > > > Maybe this is an issue which was already fixed, but I looked and find no > > bug report nor patch about it. Feel free to dismiss the problem report > > if it's not interesting or useful. > > > postgres was compiled locally at 4e54d231a. It'd been running > > continuously since September without crashing until a couple weeks ago > > (and running nearly-continuously for months before that). > > It possibly could be: > > Author: Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> > Branch: master [cb2e7ddfe] 2022-12-02 18:10:30 -0800 > Branch: REL_15_STABLE Release: REL_15_2 [c6a60471a] 2022-12-02 18:07:47 -0800 > Branch: REL_14_STABLE Release: REL_14_7 [6344bc097] 2022-12-02 18:10:30 -0800 > Branch: REL_13_STABLE Release: REL_13_10 [7944d2d8c] 2022-12-02 18:13:40 -0800 > Branch: REL_12_STABLE Release: REL_12_14 [35b99a18f] 2022-12-02 18:16:14 -0800 > Branch: REL_11_STABLE Release: REL_11_19 [af3517c15] 2022-12-02 18:17:54 -0800 > > Prevent pgstats from getting confused when relkind of a relation changes > > But the fact that it's on a catalog table's stats makes it less likely, > although not impossible. > > > Any chance there were conversions from tables to views in that connection?
Nope, not possible - the stack trace actually shows this is during connection establishment. Thomas, see stack trace upthread? Greetings, Andres Freund
