David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks for chipping in on this. Can you confirm if you think this > should apply to VACUUM options? We're not talking GUCs here.
My druthers would be to treat them similarly to GUCs. I recognize that I might be in the minority, and that doing so would entail touching a lot of existing messages in this area. Nonetheless, I think this area is not being consistent with our wider conventions, which is why for example defGetString is out of step with these messages. regards, tom lane