> On 26 Apr 2023, at 13:02, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 26 Apr 2023, at 12:18, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <[email protected]> wrote:

>> The attached patch fixes this problem, and updates prev_remaining inside
>> the loop.
> 
> Nice catch, that indeed seems like a proper fix.  This was introduced in
> ce6b672e44 and so doesn't need a backpatch.

Pushed, but without the comment extension as I felt the existing comment aptly
discussed the codepath. Thanks!

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to