On 4/27/23 8:04 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 2:30 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote:
Additionally, I think if we start recording role OID, then we need a
full set of management clauses for each individual option ownership.
Otherwise, we would leave this new role OID without necessarily
management facilities.  But with them, the whole stuff will look like
awful overengineering.

I can also predict a lot of ambiguous cases.  For instance, we
existing setting can be overridden with a different role OID.  If it
has been overridden can the overwriter turn it back?

[RMT hat]

While the initial bug has been fixed, given there is discussion on reverting 096dd80f3, I've added this as an open item.

I want to study this a bit more before providing my own opinion on revert.

Thanks,

Jonathan


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to