On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 09:24:14AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > I'll pick a test case that generates a reasonable amount of WAL 256 > bytes. What do you think of the following? > > test-case 2: -T900, WAL ~256 bytes (for c in 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 > 512 768 1024 2048 4096 - takes 3.5hrs) > test-case 2: -t1000000, WAL ~256 bytes > > If okay, I'll fire the tests.
Sounds like a sensible duration, yes. What's your setting for min/max_wal_size? I assume that there are still 16GB throttled with target_completion at 0.9? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
