> On 10 May 2023, at 19:33, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> I frankly don't > know why --role matching CREATE ROLE ... ROLE IN was not already > confusing in pre-PG 16. Any new ideas for improvement? IIRC there were a number of ideas presented in that thread but backwards compatibility with --role already "taken" made it complicated, so --role and --member were the least bad options. > At a minium I would like to apply the attached doc patch to PG 16 to > improve awkward wording in CREATE ROLE and createuser. No objection. + role. (This in effect makes the new role a <quote>group</quote>.) While not introduced here, isn't the latter part interesting enough to warrant not being inside parenthesis? -- Daniel Gustafsson
